Public v. Private Life Essay

In Milan Kunderas book, Testaments Betrayed, he contends that people exercise very differently when they are in habitual compared to their insular lives. Milan suitably emphasizes the need for separation betwixt is public and mysterious life, and asserts that the real criminals are the ones who attempt to break that boundary. Logically, people will understand and do things when they are alone that would be beyond the realm of hold behavior when they are in public. Therefore, I agree with Kunderas look at that the curtain between these two servicemans should non be tampered with and that the curtain-rippers are the material offenders.There are many times where national chaos and doubt has been created through people meddling in the private lives of other people. For example, the paparazzi are constantly trying to expose the personal experiences of countless celebrities. Recently they succeeded with the percolation of the universal picture-messaging application, Snapcha t, as well as Apples coveted web-based storage facility, the iCloud. These hackers were able to obtain numerous explicit photographs of renowned actresses, including Jennifer Lawrence and capital of Seychelles Justice, and distribute them for the military man to see. This is extremely embarrassing to those women and, much to their chagrin, those pictures meant for somebody stringent and important to them are now being hungrily consumed by the eyeball of some 12-year old kid on their laptop.Since this barrier between private and personal life was broken by meddlers, these celebrities are now viewed as indecent, and have lost much of the admiration they had before the incident. How could the exposure of ones private life to the entire world possibly be considered just? These ladies did nothing wrong, yet they are harshly criticized for their actions because somebody precious to interfere in their private lives. This incident clearly demonstrates that the insatiable paparazzi, not the innocent celebrities, are the true criminals here.Our nations history overly holds many instances of interferers meddling in the private lives of our elected officials. One much(prenominal) example would be BillClintons affair with Monica Lewinsky. Yes, he did semi on his wife, but was it really fair to let the entire world know that he did that? When the government was informed about the situation, the presidents unfortunate predicament was broadcast to the entire nation. The situation escalated to the point of indefensible impeachment hearings, but fortunately Clinton was acquitted by the Senate.Clinton nearly lost his darling wife and his job because his private life was exposed by those who had no right to be sticking their noses into his personal affairs. The peeping Toms that yanked open the curtain between Clintons actions backstage and his affairs in the publics slur completely ruined Clintons life. If these felons hadnt intruded, Clinton would have been spared a w orld full of ignominy and embarrassment. Therefore, it is indisputable that the ones truly at fault are the criminals who exposed Clinton, because his lives, both private and public, were devastated by their irresponsible actions.In summary, outgoing invasions of privacy have shown that many negative effects may will from such rash and unprovoked actions. It is therefore only just and right-hand(a) that the steel grate between ones private and public lives remain forever and eternally sealed.