America Does Not Need Gun Control Essay -- argumentative, persuasive,

submarine sandwich control is often considered as an effective means of protecting cut-and-dried citizens. We all want to feel safe, and its easy to ascribe nonions of safety to the paper of gun control. Unfortunately, feeling safe and actually being safe bathroom be very different things. Gun control sounds wonderful in theory no guns means no shootings. If provided it were that simple. When one considers or so of the worst shootings and gun-related crimes in recent history, its peculiar to pick out how often these occurred in places where guns were illegal to carry or even own. Its downright disturbing to realize that, in some cases, the only armed person in exhibition was the one planning a crime. A sign that says no guns might as well say no resistance. What safer environment could existfor a criminal? It is my intention, throughout this paper, to discuss the disadvantages and incongruities of gun control policies, and to highlight and provide argument for the p eremptory benefits of gun ownership.The major task with gun control laws is that it is likely only the law-abiding will obey them. In the midst of planning or perpetrating a crime, is it plausible that criminals stop and wonder whether their firearm is duly registered with the state, or even legal in their local ordinance? Seems kind of silly. In the meantime, some conscientious citizens have turned in their firearms while others no longer carry them out of the house, or carry their handguns about in a locked case in their car (where they are about as useful a means for defense as butter for deletion granite). Clearly, the law is only a restriction upon those who obey it.A nonher problem is deciding whether or not gun control laws are even, well, lawful. This is not as cut and dried ... ...it is up to individuals to decide whether or not owning a gun for self-defense is the right choice in their life. It is a responsibility, and not to be taken lightly. All persons must decide t his on their own, but no one should be able decide that it is the awry(p) choice for everybody else.Works CitedDeShaney v. Winnebago Cty. Soc. Servs. Dept., 489 U.S. 189, 196 (1989).Injury Prevention & Control Data & Statistics (WISQARSTM). CDC. Centers for distemper Control and Prevention, 4 Mar. 2015. Web. 16 May 2015.Lott, John R. Jr. more than Guns, Less Crime Understanding Crime and Gun-Control Laws, Third Edition (Studies in Law and Economics). Chicago U of Chicago P, 2010. Print.McDonald v. Chicago, 561 U.S. ___ (2010). (slip op., 44). smooth Arms Survey. Small Arms Survey 2014 Guns and the City. Web. 16 May 2015.http//www.smallarmssurvey.org/