Dostoevsky and Maslow: Needs in Life, How They Are Prioritized, and the Exceptions

Dostoevsky has written, Without a clear perception of his reasons for living, man entrust never consent to live, and will rather destroy himself than tarry on earth, though he be surrounded with bread. (The Grand Inquisitor) With indirect opposition, Maslows image on these needs is stated in his quote, A person missing food, love, and self-esteem, would most likely hunger for food more strongly than anything else. A number of instances stand as evidence to both Maslow and Dostoevskys instructions.First let us look at the claim Fyodor Dostoevsky has made. The Bible also has ternion references for a very similar thought. Scripture has expressed, in Deuteronomy 83, Matthew 44, and Luke 44, that Man does not live on bread al sensation, yet on every word that comes from the mouth of God. (The Bible) All individuals stick out reliable the Bible as truth would feel this way and therefore access code careers needs as Dostoevsky. The act of fasting is also an example of how Fyodors statement might come into play during an individuals life.Another group of individuals who might be observed to follow the Dostoevsky idea would be those who are suffering from earnest mental disorders. A loss of regular and proper diet is a symptom of severe cases of depression, anxiety, and stress. (MayoClinic) They become so focused on their fight down to overcome these feelings, of being lost, or alone, or unorganized, and unsafe, that the priority of food becomes pushed aside. besides in Maslows Pyramid the feelings of base hit and organization, love and belonging, are all position higher, or less important, than the need to see hunger. (Myers) Order of prioritization is the foundation of contradiction between the two statements.Abraham Maslows idea seems to be more realistic to a majority of the remaining population. How is it reasonable to think a person would get to the capability to even find their identity operator or the purpose in life without the energy suppl ied by fulfilling basic needs, like eating? This was a common reaction I heard from peers and adults after telling of Dostoevskys statement. Gandhi said, yet God cannot talk to a starving man except in terms of bread. (Aldrich) Some needs take priority over others. (Myers) Our information ability causes us to have feelings of motivation for needs the most concrete are physiological needs, like our drive to eat. It would be unhealthy and tiring to abate and ignore your bodies drive to eat while you find your identity. In utmost(a) measures you could even die doing this.As we can see, neither Maslow nor Dostoevskys claims can be applied to human beings as an entirety, as there are exceptions. The differences and private circumstances attached to individuals are all too different. Even Abraham Maslow himself know that not all personalities followed his proposed hierarchy of needs. (Huitt) We have discovered though, that both of our statements run to be more applicable to one gr oup over the other. apparitional individuals would be highly likely to side with Dostoevskys views, where as large number who do not value an identity outside their own would agree with Maslows prioritization of needs.To form off of Abraham Maslows hierarchy of needs, it has been proposed, (Norwood) a joint effort of trying to satisfy a single level of a need is also learning how to continue to satisfy this need. During this process an individual is forming wear of their identity by developing and adopting a personalized method of reaching a need. For example, people at the esteem level seek out empowering information, and those at the safety level would need helping information. If Norwoods more currently proposed statement, that finding identity and satisfying needs are interrelated, is correct, then Maslow and Dostoevsky would both hart part in creating one universal statement.As for now, Fyodor Dostoevsky and Abraham Maslows statements of needs in life and how they are prior itized stand separately. Across humanity, some people accept one over the other as true. In my research for the paper, I have been able to loosely affiliate certain groups of people with Maslow or Dostoevskys claims. A number of instances stand as evidence to both statements. Each idea is held accountable in the correct situations. It is not a surprise to me how the line of deciding on a dominant idea has not been settled.